|
Bruce Eves: Challenging Art
Frequently, events collide to reveal ready-made, and often hilariously
accidental, juxtapositions. Given the bizarre coupling of high-end advertising
with the traumatic low-end editorial content that appears daily on page three of
The New York Times - it should be fairly simple to appreciate the
conceptual possibilities of seemingly arbitrary pairings. These sometimes
disturbing, often evocative, formulations recall the ironic contrasts to be
found everywhere in our culture. That these inadvertent narratives achieve a
conceptual sum greater than the individual parts can be found in Four Queens,
in which an old strip of photographic negatives brings together (quite by
accident) a meeting of apparent opposites. Held up to the light, the individual
images are bound together by an unspoken commonality. A literal reading shows
the upper negative savoring an oiled and preening bodybuilder, evidently snapped
by a photographer just prior to an official portrait session with Her Majesty
Elizabeth II poised against the backdrop of an overdeveloped, Victorian-era
neoclassical interior.
Yet the title demands a closer inspection, in part
because it appropriates a dated and infinitely mutable code word from the
Homosexual lexicon and the frames themselves are re-photographs of well-known
images. By bringing together images by the high-strung British snob Cecil Beaton
and the American fitness enthusiast George Butler,, the notion of
"queens" is taken one step further. While the preferences of the
designer of "My Fair Lady" have been widely known for years, his
portrait of a head of state helps to unravel the mystery surrounding the
remaining two characters in this little drama. The nature of their obsessions,
though suspect, cannot be known. Nonetheless their worshipful voyeurism and
exhibitionist vanity alludes to the possibility that this is more than a latent
relationship.
BACK
This
evocative and self-reinforcing union of contrasting images is further explored
in Geschlechtsübergänge where two photographs from opposite ends of
the twentieth century are seamlessly brought together.
Paradoxically, while the piece is almost pretty in appearance, its inherent voyeuristic
and objectified approach is the hallmark of clinical, medical, and psycho-sociological research.
This piece juxtaposes a 1906 photograph by the pioneering German sexologist
Magnus Hirschfeld of an effeminate she-man with one of a hulking, naked
modern-day he-man lifted from the Internet. As a living specimen, the invert
bolsters the doctor's theory of the third sex, a notion that gay people were
neither wholly man nor woman, drawn from the ancient Greek creation myth
detailed in Plato's Symposium by Aristophanes. This added a degree of historical
credibility that is simply hare-brained today. While the third-sexer stands in
profile, held motionless for the camera by a steel brace up his spine, the stud
confronts the viewer head-on but is trapped inside the sprocketed framework of a
filmstrip. Even with its incomprehensible title (drawn from one of Hirschfeld's
published works and roughly translated as "On STDs"), it suggests the
heavy barrage of 20th century history and plays into the shock of recognition
for every gay man aware of his perennial outsider status.
BACK
With a
nod to Jasper Johns and his punning " Painting with Balls", Geometry
with Balls runs both hot and cold. This self-portrait, created by sitting on
a scanner, butts up against its mechanical twin, an arrangement of pencil,
compass, and protractor. This geometry set is as large, cold, and logical, as
the giant pair of testicles to its right is hairy, steamy, and in your face. The grid structure dividing
the piece reduces this superficial self-obsession to something far more
ambivalent. Just as a successful artwork used to "have balls", the
assumption of being blessed with a set of low hangers is a cross-cultural
assurance of masculine superiority. Yet the geometry set becomes the
pseudo-eugenics master - measuring, objectifying, and categorizing a body in
accordance with a set of predetermined (yet elusive) rules.
BACK
Setting aside for a moment the apparent self-directed ridicule in Self-Portrait
with Bayonets, the question arises, who is mocking whom? Is this naked guy
asserting control, spreading his cheeks and fingering his asshole, taunting the
cops at some anti-authoritarian street demonstration? (And by implication is the
artist telling you, the art-loving public, where you can kiss it?) Or is it
power politics of a more sinister and sadistic nature? This piece is blunt and
antagonistic yet open-ended and ambiguous.
BACK
The
heroically scaled hands and forearms of little dolls thrust up into the air in Ravenous
unite two extreme emotional states. Perhaps the exuberance on display
celebrates the thrill of religious-like rapture often felt at communal events,
but it also implies the desperate pleading of defeated resignation. But hedonism and capture seem to
cancel each other out, or do they?
BACK
Troublingly aggressive and confrontational to some, Two Demonstrations
explores
two very different types of public display. An all-male orgy captured on film is
juxtaposed with a staged political photo-op from the Middle East The viewer is
simultaneously cast in the role of passive
connoisseur and terrorized object of assault.
(Dependent as it is on your own personal world-view, the question of who exactly
is doing the terrorizing is left amusingly vague.) The intent is to force the
viewers to align themselves with one of the two opposing camps, but they find
themselves placed into a paradoxical situation. Some will find one side
or the other shocking, perverse, and repugnant - but the alternative choice is
perhaps far worse. Closer examination of this closed universe reveals it to be a
carefully articulating series of opposites (male and female, nudity and
concealment, Western and non-Western, free-flowing private sexual expression and
regimented violent
public protest, and one assumes self-segregating homosexuals and heterosexuals).
BACK
Given
the ongoing neo-Cromwellian morality campaigns - accompanied by the Greek chorus
of media hand wringing - the propensity for sex panic among conservatives is
always hilariously ham-handled. Just as Dr. Henry Frankenstein shrieked It’s
Alive when his attempt at micromanaging a program of biological
engineering proved successful, the hyped up emotions of the cartoon character
occupying the upper half of this photo assembly result from his having made an
unanticipated self-discovery. Realizing, perhaps for the first time, that his
lower body seems to have a mind of its own is both startling and hilarious.
BACK
Doubling is a psychological state adopted by the traumatized as a means of
stepping outside of themselves when faced with a situation in which, under
normal circumstances, they would go mad. As a form of managed schizophrenia, it
is a technique of self-survival in which a task at hand is viewed as distant and abstracted, and has been
found to be common among slaughterhouse workers and concentration camp guards.
An inversion has taken place in which individuals become simulacra of
themselves. While the doll is a stand-in for something living in Double
Doppelganger , the design within this bondage tableau featuring the naked and
tensely muscled G. I. Joe finds its double in the mechanical construction of
angled compasses and thrusting pencils to his right. He has been reduced to
nothing more then a machine. The negative space where his round, firm bum should
be is echoed by the arcing ruler at the center of the compass. These basic
geometry tools extend the doubling one more generation away from something
thinking and breathing by creating a simulacrum of a simulacrum.
BACK
Is
Four Triangles - a studio portrait of a cocky naked man on his knees with
arms akimbo (made anonymous by a large paper cone over his head) - an
unrepentant dunce, a naughty Klansman, or an elaborate formalist gag? While the
image forces the viewer to confront an aggressive naked man (albeit one unfamiliar with the inside of a
gym) the title, as always, serves an ironic purpose: it demands that the
situation be approached in purely formalist terms. Drawing the viewer’s
attention away from any potential psychological interpretation of this
self-portrait, the title brings to the fore details - a symmetrical
arrangement of geometric shapes, in addition to the paper cone, found in the negative spaces between
my legs and arms - that render the content
inconsequential.
BACK
Double
Self-Portrait Measured Twice at once critiques our unrelenting obsession
with age and body image and extends the parameters of a form as traditional and
ego-driven as portraiture. With a nod to the implicit homoeroticism of old
master "Saint Sebastian" paintings, the crisply recorded body
measurements are joined with the (sadly underdeveloped) body parts by a barrage
of sneering, accusing arrows. As an additional insinuatingly bitchy put-down, it
is paired with a running mathematical breakdown of my age - in seconds, minutes,
hours, days, months, and years (plus fragments of a century and millennium).
BACK
Sex
and violence meet again in a head-on collision in Red/Green/Stop/Go. Brilliant
of color but dark of mood, it offers on one level a silly off-handed anatomical
pun - but this reading also sits in tandem with a dark warning. The big green
man getting his nipples twisted is perhaps unaware that lurking outside his
field of vision is a row of bullets illuminated by some hellish light. Just as
surely as red follows green on traffic lights, shadowing every advance there is
the potential for violence and backlash.
BACK
The
unzipped and shackled slave displayed in an ad hoc exhibition of sadomasochistic
technique may be a willing performer, but the title Two Triangles
is the
star of the show. While the object within this marriage of the horizontal and
vertical may be an outré showoff, the subject is rational and
analytical. His ankles restraints - running parallel to the lower frame of
reference - provide a base for the triangular negative space between his legs,
which is further echoed in the inverted mirror image above. The apex of this inverted triangle
points toward the masochist's crotch while it is topped off by a particularly
fierce-looking dog collar.
BACK
Legal
maneuvering in the 1860s led German physicians to invent the word heterosexual
in an effort to explain the biological basis of rape, and to denote the
psychological pathology of straight male compulsive sexual behavior. At the same
time the notion that gay people were members of an actual third sex led to the coining of
'homosexual' as the catch-all term to accommodate a burgeoning awareness of
sexual orientation. Yet these early theories received serious international
scientific currency and were the basis for many (not unsuccessful)
legal/political campaigns, foreshadowing the debate of us versus them continuing
to rage today. While the rapists of a century ago gradually came to be accepted
as’ normal’, the others - forever trapped in their limbo world between men
and women - remained of interest to pathologists until 1973. When the American
Psychiatric Association, prompted by gay activists, decreed homosexuality was no longer to
be regarded as a sickness in need of a cure, it was a short honeymoon before
gay men were dragged back into the realm of medical research.
When the famed
Kinsey Institute for Sex Research released yet another study during the Reagan
years concluding that sexual minorities are no more dysfunctional - no 'less
normal' - than members of the approved orientation, they lost their government funding.
Their conclusions were unacceptable in a landscape tainted by Christian
fundamentalism. The clinical voyeurism of Lab Rats
speaks to the issue of
people dehumanized and objectified in the interests of scientific progress. In
this juxtaposition of sex and science, a trio of surgeons in gowns and masks in
a sterile operating theater is paired with an image of a rather mundane
non-procreative sex act. In a starlit high-contrast black and white photostat
the protected and sterilized doctors are contrasted with the naked bodies and
luridly tinted photograph of the blowjob below.
BACK
An
on-going project has been to photograph every inch of the surface of my body.
Forced to scrutinize naked expanses of flesh one is more likely to approach the
concept of humanness - exposing all the accompanying vulnerability and decay, as
well as the strength and vulgarity we all possess - in a new way. In this potpourri of
fragments, they are abstracted by their loss of context and assume metaphorical
implications greater than their original simplicity and commonality. The
photographic contact prints of my hands and feet in Untitled Self-Portrait
#45 , like the hand-prints so often employed by our Neolithic ancestors,
are the simplest means available with which to record one’s fragile existence.
With their heavy frames, arranging the prints into a simple grid imbues the
structure with a religiosity that would be lacking otherwise. But the subject
of this little icon's design is cast into doubt, and becomes far less
Christ-like with the realization that perhaps this creature is not fully human,
as it appears to have claws.
BACK
Who's
Afraid of Red Yellow and Blue? Tossing out mostly everything
except the rhetorical title from that old chestnut by Barnett Newman, this
three-panel work was made at the height of the AIDS epidemic. At a time when the arts were being
decimated and talk of quarantine was in the air, it is an assault on the liberal
pieties of those who felt that wearing the ubiquitous red ribbon was
equal to taking a political stand. Marrying the culture's obsession with sex and
violence, the piece re-sexualized a sexually transmitted disease that was too
easily sentimentalized. The upper half of each panel is a video’s-eye view of
concentration camps matched up with shots covered with colored cellophane of two
men engaged in the good old bouncy-bouncy. Although the scenario pictured here
is an imaginary one, it reflects on our collective history, and in spite of
external pressures that often descend into brutality, we are able to maintain a
level of comradeship - no matter how fleeting it may be. On a more formal level,
the serial imagery and disruptive juxtapositions - the merging of the hot and
sweaty with the cold and clinical -- reappear in my work time and time again.
BACK
As an
artist, I have been involved with projects in various media in which language
and number systems become charged metaphors. Throughout history, oppressors have used
numbers to
dehumanize people , and nowhere was this more deliberately practiced than during the Holocaust. The Circumstances Surrounding the
Untimely Death of Herr L.O. found as its genesis a paragraph in an old
issue of The New York Review of Books. In concise language, it detailed the
tragedy of one man - Leopold Obermayer -- a Swiss Jewish gay man living in
Germany at the beginning of the Third Reich.
The text reads:
"In October 1934, the Wurzburg wine merchant
Leopold Obermayer, a practicing Jew and a Swiss citizen, complained to the
police that his mail was being opened. He was taken into custody and, when it
was discovered that he was a homosexual, subjected to an endless series of
interrogations and beatings and incarcerations. Despite his courageous protests
and petitions, the Swiss government found it inexpedient to intervene on his
behalf. He was given a secret trial, sentenced to life imprisonment, and died in
Mauthausen in 1943."
Appropriating and enlarging this text to blunt
two-inch tall sans serif letters, the original work is reproduced on nine small heavy paper
panels in brownish-gray oil paint. Evoking the clinical bureaucratic capacity of
governments to reduce human beings to catalogued statistics, the letters are
gradually replaced with numbers following a logical system (A=I, B=2, C=3, D=4,
etc.) until by the last panel all that remains is a sheet of solid numbers.
Overlaying the text on each panel are three narrow evenly spaced black bars.
BACK
Olympia
is a reference to Edouard Manet's 1863 painting of the same name. And, yes it is photo pixelated to death, the
cliché of modern censorship; a technique used both against
and by gay culture for a variety of reasons. When Manet's work was exhibited at
the Paris Salon of 1865, it caused a furor with its frank depiction of a
contemporary, non-idealized, woman, actually a courtesan. While it drew upon
iconographic references going back to Titian and others, Manet's depiction of
the nude was outside of the then-popular classical tradition. Because of the
reactions it drew, the painting was moved higher on the wall out of reach.
Nowadays, if a more frank work of art is illustrated, the more timid in the
media [or perhaps the Mayor of New York] will pixelate the offending body parts.
Indeed gay artists and galleries afraid of offending the non-gay audience will
do the same. And even more common in commercial uses, especially on the world
wide web, gay porn distributors will pixelate the good stuff so you need to 'pay
to play'. Bruce's artwork is a play on all these things. [ - Gay Art Gallery]
BACK
|